Leadership question 1 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Leadership question 1 - Essay Example , portrays a strong personality and makes effective decisions at the time of conflict, among his key influencers are pertinent beliefs in proportionality, not being rational and empathizing with his enemy. He explains that rationality is inconsequential in a time of conflict and a leader must therefore make decisions based on their judgments of the situations. Most conflicts are always irrational; he thus explains that making rational decisions at such times may only cost a leader his or her subjects. Proportionality is his guiding principles as he employs the resources he had. The resources often range from the human resources to financial and material resource among many others. Leaders must portray strong personalities capable of making judgments that safeguard the interests of their resources. Robert McNamara’s success arose from his ability to budget for the resources at his disposal appropriately. This way, he made decisions that protected the interests of both the country and his subjects. Additionally, he explains that empathizing with the enemy is a sure way of making functional decisions especially in times of conflicts. Such is a rational philosophy owing to the fact that in conflicts only the two parties exit. Each party thus makes decisions based on the prevailing circumstances of the other. By empathizing with the enemy, it becomes possible either to end the conflict or to compel the enemy to act in a particular manner thus solving the conflict amicably as he did in most of his time as the secretary of defense (James, Langan and Sarah 6). The film portrays Robert McNamara as a strong and independent mined individual who control an entire government department at a time of conflict successfully. Among his strengths are independent personality which enabled him make and take responsibility of his decisions. As a government secretary, Robert McNamara would have taken instructions from the government through the president. Instead, he often consulted